During a behind-closed-doors look at Double Fine's latest game , I'm struck that this is probably the studio's strangest game yet. With a back catalogue that includes everything from psychic summer camps to living Russian dolls, that's really saying something.
It stars a living lighthouse—tottering about on tree root legs—who travels through a post-apocalyptic world with a mutant bird friend. Focusing h25 com เข้าสู่ระบบ its light beam on parts of the environment causes changes, such as making a rock creature withdraw its limbs and slam down into the ground, or forcing back shadowy tentacles.
That makes for some light (ahem) puzzle-solving and exploration, elevated by the surreal surroundings. In one section, the lighthouse is able to use its beam to control the flow of time, reversing back to past events or fast-forwarding to the future. In another, it gets festooned with sticky candy floss that allows it to float through the air across bubblegum fields.
When Double Fine was , Tim Schafer assured fans that the deal wouldn't impact on the kind of projects the studio made going forward. A natural fear at the time was that being part of Xbox would force the developer to become more mainstream and lose its indie charm. But the truth, apparently, is the opposite: it has had an impact on how Double Fine works, but in the sense of letting it get even weirder, not more buttoned up.
According to James Spafford, director of marketing and communications at Double Fine, the key is GamePass.
"We can be a little bit more creative. We can take more risks. We can now make games for GamePass," he says. "Where before we really needed people to buy those games, now we can put them onto a platform where people can just try them out, and if they don't like them, it's fine. Or they might like them!"
That focus on GamePass ensures that Double Fine's more niche experiences are much less in competition with more mainstream, broad appeal offerings.
"People feel more able to just experiment, maybe pick up something a little bit weirder," says Spafford. "You don't have to choose between a game you know you're going to like versus 'I'm not sure about this lighthouse thing'. In that situation you might lean the other way, but when there's no downside to just trying it out, it frees us up."
And he confirms that the studio has "multiple new projects" in development, embracing that freedom with their own strange ideas.
It's lovely to see a studio able to embrace its creativity like this, rather than having to tamp it down. But while it should certainly enable more unique and original games, I wish I was a bit more convinced it would lead to better ones.
An issue I've always had with Double Fine is that its ideas are often stronger than its execution. Games like Rad, Stacking, Brütal Legend, and Iron Brigade have fantastic elevator pitches and tons of personality, but often very undercooked mechanics, leading to quickly diminishing returns.
From what I've seen, Keeper seems like the most extreme example yet of that dichotomy. Visually and conceptually it's like nothing else I've seen, but what you actually do in the game is more lightweight than ever, with only very simple puzzles and gentle wandering to tie its surreal vistas together.
It's certainly ok for a game to just u31 เครดิตฟรี 188 be a charming mood piece and no more, but it feels like the indie gaming space is already awash with those. In this case it's hard not to feel like all the playful exploration of the unusual concept has come at the cost of actually finding interesting things to do with that concept.
It's a brilliantly distinctive paintjob over the top of a pretty basic and familiar style of game. Even seemingly out there ideas like controlling time only facilitate simple puzzles you've seen before.
That said, it's also clear during the demo that Double Fine is holding back a little on showing too much of Keeper. Spafford strongly hints that there are dramatic twists and turns in the game that they're keen not to spoil, and hopefully those lead to the kind of wow moments I'm looking for.
If not… well, perhaps this even weirder era of Double Fine won't be for me, and that's okay. Despite my misgivings, I'll certainly take a future where the studio gets to throw out more unique and bizarre ideas than ever over one where it gets absorbed into the Microsoft machine and ends up in a basement making skins for Call of Duty.